Thursday, December 11, 2014

Texas Politics: Why does the State have a say on the distribution rights of a private company anyway?

Yesterday (or, earlier today at the time I'm writing) the news broke that 3 Texas craft brewers are suing the State of Texas regarding a 2013 law that required them to relinquish their local distribution rights to distribution middlemen for no compensation.

State Sued for "Stifling the Texas Craft Beer Renaissance". Reeve Hamilton, Texas Tribune

Three Texas breweries filed a lawsuit against the state on Wednesday seeking to to overturn a 2013 law they say violates the Texas Constitution by forcing them to give away their territorial distribution rights for free.
In their complaint, filed in state district court in Austin, the heads of Live Oak Brewing in Austin, Peticolas Brewing Company in Dallas and Revolver Brewing in Granbury say that were it not for Senate Bill 639, they would be expanding. Instead, their plans to bring their beer to new markets around the state have been put on hold. 

For conservatives this should be a no-brainer.  However, it should also be taken further to question why the State has laws on the books regulating many private-businesses anyway.

When the bill was passed it was clear that it was a hand-out to the distribution companies, some of whom are owned or are subsidiaries of the large, multi-national brewing companies with whom the craft brewers are taking market share. For Republican legislators who campaign on the so-called "free-market" and other politically hollow terms this was an all-to-usual anti-free-market action. I'm sure it's just a coincidence that the large alcohol distribution companies throw law-makers a big "welcome to the session" gala before each legislature convenes.

Of course, real reform would mean looking at a host of silly laws like this.  For example: Why must car dealerships only be open on Saturday or Sunday, but not both? Why can't liquor stores be open on Sunday?

When you hear so-called conservative policy makers talk about waste in the Government you rarely hear them mention laws such as these.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.  If you look down at the municipal level you can find many ordinances in cities across the state attempting to regulate something the State has no business regulating.

In an era where the State rushed head-long to supposedly de-regulate utilities and higher education (two areas that are not really free-markets [in reality they're either regulated monopolies or oligopolies]) it's amazing that in Texas, where our politicians constantly beat into our brains that they're more business friendly than anyone else, these types of laws are viewed as solutions.

The best outcome, for consumers, would be for the courts to strike the law down and decimate Texas three-tier system when it comes to alcohol sales. Even better for consumers would be the newly (very) Republican legislature to take a look at all areas where market-stifling restrictions* exist.

Fat chance though because there's a lot of money at play in Texas' legislative system.


































































*It will be read as thus by people of a progressive bent, but OF COURSE I'm not calling for a relaxation of safety or (in most cases) environmental standards.  This is specifically related to the State interfering in legal, commercial enterprise or sales transactions.